MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <4.1.19981127083748.00a473d0@pop.tiac.net>
            <E0zjODE-0000ya-00@heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk>
            <19981127212632.D5643@maths.tcd.ie>
Message-ID:  <13922.24865.178414.901591@srahtz>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <19981127212632.D5643@maths.tcd.ie>
Date:         Mon, 30 Nov 1998 09:10:57 +0000
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: What is "base" LaTeX
Status: R

Timothy Murphy writes:
 > The only PDF documents I've seen with useful hypertext
 > are pdflatex ones presumably generated using hyperref.
where the only links are 1:1 "click and go" types. if the source had
more sophisticated XLink syntax, we could not render it with Acrobat

 > Incidentally, has something happened to pdflatex-hypertex links,
 > or am I doing something stupid?
 > I no longer seem to get the links eg to the bibliography
 > which I used to.
is this what is known in the trade as a "bug report"? no, i have not
deliberately broken owt.

 > [It surely isn't just because I disagree with Them.
 > I know They are mean, but surely They are not malicious?]
"They" have no control over hyperref or pdftex....

sebastian