X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["388" "Fri" "27" "November" "1998" "23:22:36" "+0100" "Frank Mittelbach" "Frank.Mittelbach@UNI-MAINZ.DE" nil "17" "Re: THEM" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA07162; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 23:30:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <4.6B1318D2@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 23:30:44 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 412203 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 23:30:40 +0100 Received: from kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Ufrank@kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.158]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA24701 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 23:30:38 +0100 (MET) Received: (from Ufrank@localhost) by kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA12021 for LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 23:30:37 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE: Ufrank set sender to latex3 using -f Received: (from latex3@localhost) by frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id XAA14361; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 23:22:36 +0100 References: <4.1.19981127083748.00a473d0@pop.tiac.net> <19981127212632.D5643@maths.tcd.ie> Message-ID: <199811272222.XAA14361@frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <19981127212632.D5643@maths.tcd.ie> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 23:22:36 +0100 From: Frank Mittelbach Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: THEM Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2973 Timothy Murphy writes: > Incidentally, has something happened to pdflatex-hypertex links, > or am I doing something stupid? who knows? > [It surely isn't just because I disagree with Them. > I know They are mean, but surely They are not malicious?] THEY might be both (though i doubt to you so far) but not if bibliographies are concerned. why are THEY mean, by the way? frank