X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1305" "Fri" "27" "November" "1998" "10:53:49" "-0500" "Y&Y, Inc." "support@YANDY.COM" nil "26" "Re: What is \"base\" LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (root@kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.158]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA25196; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 17:09:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA19183; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 17:09:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <8.600D59E5@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:56:44 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 411769 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:54:12 +0100 Received: from mail-out-0.tiac.net (mail-out-0.tiac.net [199.0.65.247]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA02934 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:54:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail-out-2.tiac.net (mail-out-2.tiac.net [199.0.65.13]) by mail-out-0.tiac.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA28637 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 10:54:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from support@YandY.com) Received: from DENALI (p41.tc1.metro.MA.tiac.com [209.61.75.42]) by mail-out-2.tiac.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA07534; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 05:54:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from support@YandY.com) X-Sender: yandy@pop.tiac.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 References: <13918.48084.843833.165507@srahtz> <199811262254.IAA20689@bigted.maths.uq.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <4.1.19981127104934.03e184f0@pop.tiac.net> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 10:53:49 -0500 From: "Y&Y, Inc." Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: What is "base" LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2966 At 10:22 AM 98/11/27 , Hans Aberg wrote: >>i swear to you, i was _happy_ with 300 dpi for at least 7 years. its >>nonsensical, IMHO, to say that 300 dpi cannot display fonts >>correctly. *some* fonts come out badly, most don't >Well, that's what I meant: For hyperfine fonts and such, one must have 600 dpi. Then don't use them for this purpose. Lucida was the first font family designed exactly to address the issue of readability in a digital world. In any case, people used CM (which is thin) happily for many years on 300 dpi printers. And properly hinted `hyper fine' fonts don't have a problem at low res either... >>how does this follow at all? are you telling me you cannot read 24pt >>Lucida New Math on screen? >Believe it or not, 24pt Lucida New Math is not convenient for displaying >math formulas: One should use 10 pt, and regardless how you magnify it to >see the details, necessary in math as a tiny dot usually means something >different than something quite close to a dot, it is not very convenient. I am not sure what you are saying here, but you may be caught in the straight- jacket of browsers (which cannot magnify). Acrobat Reader provides for on screen magnification. Sebastian's example of 24pt LNM -- in my reading --- stands for 10pt LNM zoomed to 240% on screen.