X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["692" "Fri" "27" "November" "1998" "14:48:52" "+0000" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "17" "Re: What is \"base\" LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA14098; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:02:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <10.BD12A582@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:02:04 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 411683 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:01:57 +0100 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA28041 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:01:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]; by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP; for ""; sender "s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk"; id OAA24444; hop 0; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 14:53:24 GMT Received: from srahtz (actually host srahtz.elsevier.co.uk) by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Fri, 27 Nov 1998 15:00:25 +0000 X-Mailer: emacs 20.3.2 (via feedmail 9-beta-3 Q); VM 6.61 under Emacs 20.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <199811262254.IAA20689@bigted.maths.uq.edu.au> Message-ID: <13918.48084.843833.165507@srahtz> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 14:48:52 +0000 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: What is "base" LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2955 Hans Aberg writes: > Experimenting with laserprinting showed that 300 dpi is too low for > displaying fonts correctly, so one needs at least 600 dpi for that. But to > be on the sure side, laser probably want 1200 dpi. > i swear to you, i was _happy_ with 300 dpi for at least 7 years. its nonsensical, IMHO, to say that 300 dpi cannot display fonts correctly. *some* fonts come out badly, most don't > So, before that happens, it will not be possible to design documents to be > read on the screen if that is to contain the (graphical) information we are > used to on paper. how does this follow at all? are you telling me you cannot read 24pt Lucida New Math on screen? sebastian