X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["971" "Fri" "27" "November" "1998" "09:47:17" "-0500" "Y&Y, Inc." "support@YANDY.COM" nil "27" "Re: What is \"base\" LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA09064; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 15:48:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <4.C6C06EAB@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 15:48:01 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 411649 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 15:47:56 +0100 Received: from mail-out-0.tiac.net (mail-out-0.tiac.net [199.0.65.247]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA26448 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 15:47:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail-out-4.tiac.net (mail-out-4.tiac.net [199.0.65.16]) by mail-out-0.tiac.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA32151 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 09:47:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from support@YandY.com) Received: from DENALI (p41.tc1.metro.MA.tiac.com [209.61.75.42]) by mail-out-4.tiac.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA05264; Fri, 27 Nov 1998 14:47:34 GMT (envelope-from support@YandY.com) X-Sender: yandy@pop.tiac.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <4.1.19981127094131.03e1bf10@pop.tiac.net> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 09:47:17 -0500 From: "Y&Y, Inc." Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: What is "base" LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2954 At 08:45 AM 98/11/27 , Robin Fairbairns wrote: >pdf isn't, it seems, good enough for mathematicians. at least for one >of them in this university ;-) >in a thread about putting maths on the web (in an internal newsgroup) >i've today been told that "converting whole documents to pdf is >entirely the wrong idea". Translation: Duh! What is PDF? >the imaging model is fine; there are those who don't think the >hypertextual model is good enough, it seems. Translation: I barely know how to do it one way, so don't confuse me with facts. Or perhaps: ghee, I didn't know PDF supports hypertext, does it? There is indeed much such pigheadedness around. Spouting dogma is the standard way to counter good suggestions that people don't want to have to deal with. Has this person seen the examples at http://www.math.uakron.edu/~dpstory/acrotex.html or others listed at http://www.YandY.com/resources.htm#pdf ? Or looked on news://comp.text.pdf ? Regards, Berthold.