X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1584" "Wed" "25" "November" "1998" "13:04:32" "+0000" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "32" "Re: What is \"base\" LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA14278; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:07:24 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <0.6290DEEC@listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:07:22 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 411021 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:07:16 +0100 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA09417 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:07:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]; by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP; for ""; sender "s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk"; id MAA08544; hop 0; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 12:58:57 GMT Received: from srahtz (actually host srahtz.elsevier.co.uk) by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 25 Nov 1998 13:06:40 +0000 X-Mailer: emacs 20.3.2 (via feedmail 9-beta-3 Q); VM 6.61 under Emacs 20.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <13914.43859.281032.18501@srahtz> <365A9F55.88C46733@na.uni-tuebingen.de> <199811142302.AAA24385@na6.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de> <13913.60537.514744.407614@srahtz> Message-ID: <13916.96.643934.277862@srahtz> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 13:04:32 +0000 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: What is "base" LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2909 Hans Aberg writes: > I thought it was the opposite, Sebastian speaking about the faith common > among businesses, but knowing nothing about the real world that researchers > experiences: It is like teaching students at an university which thinks well, to be fair to me, i have worked for 14 years in academia in various roles (including teaching CS) and only 4 in business :-} when i joined this company, I worked in TeX support, in a religious way; 4 years later, its plain as the nose on your face that TeX _as author/editor interface_ has lost the battle for market dominance. the Good Guys do not always win, historically [1] > The best way out of this dilemma for publishers and typesetters is to > having as little as possible with this semantic aspect of contents that the > mathematician supplies, and only provide the things that has to do with the > general graphical look: Anything else is going to be too expensive, and the > interface between mathematician and proof-readers does not work anyhow. sure. i might not argue with this > In order to support this, TeX was invented, and LaTeX was invented in order > to support using TeX as an authoring tool, even though most mathematicians and sadly, the mathematicians (led by the rather unusual Don Knuth) took a license to escape from the confines of $..$ and starting spending days and weeks formatting their bibliographies (an area which, you must admit, is NOT a special case for mathematicians) sebastian [1] sorry, you 20th century mathematicians, as an ex-archaeologist, now i am on _my_ territory.