X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["566" "Tue" "10" "November" "1998" "10:36:17" "-0500" "Mimi Burbank" "mimi@SCRI.FSU.EDU" nil "14" "Re: frontmatter was: What is \"base\" LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA15347; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:40:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <4.538D0027@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:40:45 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 407794 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:39:40 +0100 Received: from mailer.scri.fsu.edu (mailer.scri.fsu.edu [144.174.112.142]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA17653 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:39:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from ibm11 (ibm11.scri.fsu.edu [144.174.131.11]) by mailer.scri.fsu.edu (8.8.7/8.7.5) with SMTP id KAA16065 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:39:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by ibm11 (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64) id AA19116; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:36:18 -0500 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <9811101536.AA19116@ibm11> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199811101441.OAA29688@nag.co.uk> from "David Carlisle" at Nov 10, 98 02:41:37 pm Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 10:36:17 -0500 From: Mimi Burbank Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: frontmatter was: What is "base" LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2817 David Carlisle writes: > for the revtex model we had each author could have multiple `main' > addresses. In addition any number of `additional' addresses for > `visiting..' or `previously at..' type addresses. I read this list with great interest, but must comment that maintaining RevTeX is a herculean undertaking, and the AIP is run by mad scientists suffering from dementia and schizophrenia .... and those who use their software begin to suffer as well ;-) mimi burbank (who works with about 60 physicists of varying <<>> )