X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["453" "Tue" "10" "November" "1998" "15:07:49" "GMT" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "12" "Re: frontmatter was: What is \"base\" LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA09522; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:08:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <13.D46AC639@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:08:33 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 407728 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:08:27 +0100 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA14143 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 16:08:24 +0100 (MET) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]; by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP; for ""; sender "s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk"; id PAA05316; hop 0; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 15:00:10 GMT Received: from screavie.elsevier.co.uk by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Tue, 10 Nov 1998 15:07:54 +0000 Received: from lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk (lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.7]) by screavie.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA01264 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 15:07:44 GMT Received: (from srahtz@localhost) by lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA07188; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 15:07:49 GMT References: <98111014073073@man.ac.uk> <199811101428.OAA07064@lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk> <199811101441.OAA29688@nag.co.uk> Message-ID: <199811101507.PAA07188@lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199811101441.OAA29688@nag.co.uk> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 15:07:49 GMT From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: frontmatter was: What is "base" LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2814 > for the revtex model we had each author could have multiple `main' > addresses. In addition any number of `additional' addresses for > `visiting..' or `previously at..' type addresses. good. but you would then agree that a BibTeX set of key=value things would not cope with this? > Authors may appear all in one list with superscript index to addresses i hope this "superscript index" is in a fit state to be turned into a hyperlink? Sebastian