X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["329" "Mon" "9" "November" "1998" "16:52:21" "GMT" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "10" "Re: Quotes, HTML, and FrontPage" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil "Quotes, HTML, and FrontPage" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA02663; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 17:52:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <0.3E71916D@listserv.gmd.de>; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 17:52:55 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 408349 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 17:52:51 +0100 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA22220 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 17:52:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]; by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP; for ""; sender "s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk"; id QAA08006; hop 0; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:44:47 GMT Received: from screavie.elsevier.co.uk by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:52:29 +0000 Received: from lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk (lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.7]) by screavie.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA17950 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:52:15 GMT Received: (from srahtz@localhost) by lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA04107; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:52:21 GMT References: <199811091636.LAA12505@hilbert.math.albany.edu> Message-ID: <199811091652.QAA04107@lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199811091636.LAA12505@hilbert.math.albany.edu> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:52:21 GMT From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Quotes, HTML, and FrontPage Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2800 > For the most part I think that it does not make sense for me to > rely on a standard that is "owned" because I then have the concern > that it could be changed in an unfair way. perhaps we could have an example of a "standard" that is not "owned"; it is completely contradictory!! ISO is "owned" by its members Sebastian