X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["734" "Fri" "6" "November" "1998" "14:38:34" "+0000" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "19" "Re: Quotes and punctuation" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil "Quotes and punctuation" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA24642; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 15:51:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <11.D4F10920@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 15:51:50 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 407556 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 15:51:44 +0100 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA23024 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 15:51:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]; by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP; for ""; sender "s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk"; id OAA11377; hop 0; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 14:43:32 GMT Received: from srahtz (actually host srahtz.elsevier.co.uk) by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Fri, 6 Nov 1998 14:51:15 +0000 X-Mailer: emacs 20.3.2 (via feedmail 9-beta-3 Q); VM 6.61 under Emacs 20.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <199811061351.IAA01838@hilbert.math.albany.edu> Message-ID: <13891.2538.874709.669285@srahtz> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199811061351.IAA01838@hilbert.math.albany.edu> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 14:38:34 +0000 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Quotes and punctuation Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2743 William F. Hammond writes: > A good XML could be a good authoring language if one doesn't mind > being required always to use every element tag. For example, in good lord, do you type your XML _by hand_? thats what editors are for, to help you insert end tags > HTML is not a good single source authoring language for multiple > targets. strangely, this was not its desgn aim > For one thing a document type definition is optional with XML but > required with SGML (although it is not required to be a separate file XML is a subset of SGML, vis-a-vis the markup. the usage is not the same. > Hmmm... Isn't "
" formally incorrect syntax under SGML? (My 1996 you need the recent TC to SGML to be implemented Sebastian