X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["688" "Wed" "4" "November" "1998" "17:09:45" "GMT" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "17" "Re: Quotes and punctuation" "^Date:" nil nil "11" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA11736; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 09:53:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <11.38E61FAB@listserv.gmd.de>; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 9:50:45 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 407346 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 18:10:03 +0100 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA22548 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 18:10:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]; by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP; for ""; sender "s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk"; id RAA07732; hop 0; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 17:01:54 GMT Received: from screavie.elsevier.co.uk by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 4 Nov 1998 17:09:48 +0000 Received: from lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk (lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.7]) by screavie.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA25395 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 17:09:40 GMT Received: (from srahtz@localhost) by lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA02563; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 17:09:45 GMT References: <199811041647.LAA07555@hilbert.math.albany.edu> Message-ID: <199811041709.RAA02563@lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199811041647.LAA07555@hilbert.math.albany.edu> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 17:09:45 GMT From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Quotes and punctuation Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2730 William F. Hammond writes: > I don't fully understand Chris's guidelines for what should be > discussed here, and, therefore, I don't know whether the SGML > plans for LaTeX3 are appropriate here. are there any SGML plans for L3? > I don't understand exactly what Sebastian meant. it was a joke. i was simplying that rendering of abstract things like `quoted text' need not involve quote marks; and that SGML/XML markup of abstract markup is much easier to parse than TeX.... > problems that may be understood by all. And could we have a > paragraph or two elaborating on why the homework assignment > is important. and what qualification we get if we pass the exam. sebastian