References: <199811030953.JAA04308@nag.co.uk> <98102213123551@man.ac.uk>,
            <199811030953.JAA04308@nag.co.uk>
            <199811031653.KAA12001@dcdrjh.fnal.gov>
            <v03110701b264e9f56400@[130.237.37.58]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID:  <19981104145716.B29267@maths.tcd.ie>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <v03110701b264e9f56400@[130.237.37.58]>; from Hans Aberg on Tue,
              Nov 03, 1998 at 07:02:01PM +0100
Date:         Wed, 4 Nov 1998 14:57:16 +0000
From: Timothy Murphy <tim@MATHS.TCD.IE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: Quotes and punctuation
Status: R

On Tue, Nov 03, 1998 at 07:02:01PM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:
>
>   Returning to TeX and LaTeX, I think that we will have to wait for
> suitable extensions of TeX instead of hoping for an implementation via the
> Godel theorem. :-)

Apologies for asking a very elementary question,
but is the problem in this case that one gets into difficulty
if one says \quote{...\quote{...}...} ?
Would there still be difficulty if one said
\quote{...\inquote{...}...} ?
Ie is it the nesting of \quote that causes the problem ?

If so, it would seem to me to be simpler
to require use of \inquote or whatever
rather than re-creating the universe.

--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: tim@maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland