References: <199807020724.RAA19706@ricetub.anu.edu.au>
            <199807021940.VAA01123@frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
            <199807060810.SAA24960@ricetub.anu.edu.au>
            <199807062020.WAA19898@frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
            <199807070755.RAA26108@ricetub.anu.edu.au>
Message-ID:  <199807070641.GAA12947@ew160061.nets.de.eds.com>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <199807070755.RAA26108@ricetub.anu.edu.au>
Date:         Tue, 7 Jul 1998 13:07:03 +0200
From: Frank Mittelbach <fmitte01@EDS.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      correcting a small misunderstanding
Status: R

Richard Walker writes:

 >  > After all a lot of the documentation therein was provided by us during
 >  > the last years before that its internal documentation was very much
 >  > out of date (still is in some parts).
 >
 > If you are happy to release out-of-date and inconsistent documentation
 > for incomplete packages then in fairness to us - your guinea pigs -
 > _everything_ must be up for grabs.

i was talking about the LaTeX2e internal documentation which is 600
odd pages all available and all on CTAN. the fact that some of it is
still out of date (or undocumented) i'm sorry, but this is a huge job.
and i think essentially we did some good job here even though with
more resources we could probably do better.

frank