X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["655" "Thu" "25" "June" "1998" "15:37:39" "+0200" "Hans Aberg" "haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE" nil "14" "Re: Modules" "^Date:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil]
	nil)
Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1])
	by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA27154;
	Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:47:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <7.144F631F@listserv.gmd.de>; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:47:53 +0200
Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
          (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 371035 for
          LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:47:48 +0200
Received: from mail.nada.kth.se (root@mail.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.92]) by
          relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA11419 for
          <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:47:46
          +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from [130.237.37.112] (sl86.modempool.kth.se [130.237.37.112]) by
          mail.nada.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA08990 for
          <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>; Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:47:41
          +0200 (MET DST)
X-Sender: su95-hab@mail.nada.kth.se (Unverified)
References: <980624151914.48d9@vms.rhbnc.ac.uk>
            <980624151914.48d9@vms.rhbnc.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID:  <v03110700b1b8026539c7@[130.237.37.74]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <199806250253.MAA13499@ricetub.anu.edu.au>
Date:         Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:37:39 +0200
From: Hans Aberg <haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: Modules
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 2596

>Philip Taylor writes:
> > How can that work?  Assuming that (e.g.) "\newcommand" is macro ->
> > {... \def ...}, then without a LaTeX equivalent of PostScript's
> > "bind", you still need access to "\def"; and if "\newcommand" is
> > macro -> {... \someconcealedversionofdef ...}, then the user can
> > use "\someconcealedversionofdef" :-(

  I guess there will be a command called \tex_def or \tex/def or something,
which one can use.

  Hans Aberg
                  * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:haberg@member.ams.org>
                  * Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
                  * AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>