X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["966" "Tue" "23" "June" "1998" "11:36:32" "+0200" "Hans Aberg" "haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE" nil "21" "Re: Modules" "^Date:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA17942; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 12:48:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <13.9E8A2FDD@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 12:48:01 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 368412 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 12:47:55 +0200 Received: from mail.nada.kth.se (root@mail.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.92]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA06723 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 12:47:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [130.237.37.54] (sl34.modempool.kth.se [130.237.37.54]) by mail.nada.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA14149 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 1998 12:47:26 +0200 (MET DST) X-Sender: su95-hab@mail.nada.kth.se References: <199806220631.QAA11602@ricetub.anu.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199806230110.LAA12429@ricetub.anu.edu.au> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 11:36:32 +0200 From: Hans Aberg Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Modules Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2590 At 11:10 +1000 98/06/23, Richard Walker wrote: >Hans Aberg writes: > > One then becomes independent of that old PlainTeX once for > > all, and is free to build up an entirely new consistent logical structure. > >You mean that one is free to build up an entirely new _inconsistent_ >logical structure . . . ! We all know about creeping featurism. Even >small subcomponents such as NFSS show how difficult it is to get it >right. (And the NFSS is not modular - you can't easily add a new >`axis'. Well, at least one is freed of not being forced to do it in this or that way just because TeX or LaTeX2e did it. So that structure can be allowed to be inconsistent with TeX and LaTeX2e, but should be strengthened to be consistent within itself. Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg * Home Page: * AMS member listing: