X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["853" "Mon" "15" "June" "1998" "18:28:04" "+0200" "Hans Aberg" "haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE" nil "18" "Re: LaTeX3 naming & modules" "^Date:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA11776; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 18:29:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <14.F1C17B29@listserv.gmd.de>; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 18:29:06 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 362007 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 18:29:02 +0200 Received: from mail.nada.kth.se (root@mail.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.92]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA17341 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 18:29:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [130.237.37.151] (sl125.modempool.kth.se [130.237.37.151]) by mail.nada.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA17027 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 18:28:58 +0200 (MET DST) X-Sender: su95-hab@mail.nada.kth.se References: <199806131643.SAA23491@relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>, Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <13701.17613.13961.821690@fell.open.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 18:28:04 +0200 From: Hans Aberg Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: LaTeX3 naming & modules Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2563 >But, as Hans suggests in his other message, whether such ideas are >practical whilst the current TeX (or any extensions so far considered) >is the underlying language needs further research. This is also a point which I did not mention: For developing such ideas like modules and objects, one needs a very good context. So the best way to approach this subject is really the approach taken: Start to write these names by hand. When one has a good working kernal, one can start to think about abstractions. I then pointed out some snags that may arise down the line, and I indicated what I think is needed to get around them. Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg * Home Page: * AMS member listing: