MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <97120513432713@multivac.jb.man.ac.uk>
Message-ID:  <473-Fri05Dec1997135950+0000-s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <97120513432713@multivac.jb.man.ac.uk>
Date:         Fri, 5 Dec 1997 13:59:50 +0000
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: private macros and journal .cls
Status: R

 >
 > It seems to me that it is much better for a few people to work hard at
 > LaTeX to HTML conversion, or whatever is required, rather than making
 > each author of each paper do a lot of unnecessary work.
 >

Sure, thats why I said it *shouldnt* be an author constraint. People
who convert LaTeX should do so properly, or say up front that they
cannot do it, rather than unreasonably constraining authors.

latex2html is a red herring, of course. in practise, i don't think any
large scale publisher goes this route.

sebastian