X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["376" "Mon" "13" "October" "1997" "16:00:34" "-0700" "Marcel Oliver" "oliver@MATH.UCI.EDU" nil "10" "Re: LaTeX journal and publisher macros" "^Date:" nil nil "10" nil nil nil nil nil]
	nil)
Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1])
	by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA21460;
	Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:01:37 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <7.201452AA@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 1:01:11 +0200
Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
          (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 214664 for
          LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:00:42 +0200
Received: from math.uci.edu (root@math.uci.edu [128.200.174.70]) by
          relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA27743 for
          <LATEX-L@relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>; Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:00:40
          +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from rasha.math.uci.edu by math.uci.edu (8.8.5) id QAA12272; Mon, 13
          Oct 1997 16:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rasha.math.uci.edu by rasha.math.uci.edu (8.8.5) id XAA19036;
          Mon, 13 Oct 1997 23:00:35 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; IRIX 6.2 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <97100911582847@multivac.jb.man.ac.uk>
            <199710132045.VAA09228@frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID:  <3442A811.41C6@math.uci.edu>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Date:         Mon, 13 Oct 1997 16:00:34 -0700
From: Marcel Oliver <oliver@MATH.UCI.EDU>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: LaTeX journal and publisher macros
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 2453

Is the APS involved in this discussion?  Not so long ago they
used RevTeX which apparently has compatibility problems
with LaTeX (I don't have any personal experience).  I
remember hearing that they were working on an update.

This discussion might be a chance to make sure a
significant part of the LaTeXing world is not once again
locked into a separate standard.

  Marcel