X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1805" "Thu" "9" "October" "1997" "10:52:14" "GMT" "Phillip Helbig" "helbig@MULTIVAC.JB.MAN.AC.UK" nil "45" "Re: LaTeX journal and publisher macros" "^Date:" nil nil "10" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA07252; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 11:55:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <11.BF811083@listserv.gmd.de>; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 11:55:49 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 211192 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 11:55:45 +0200 Received: from multivac (multivac.jb.man.ac.uk [130.88.24.128]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA27272 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 11:55:43 +0200 (MET DST) X-VMS-To: SMTP%"LATEX-L@relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de" X-VMS-Cc: HELBIG Message-ID: <97100910521469@multivac.jb.man.ac.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 10:52:14 GMT From: Phillip Helbig Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: LaTeX journal and publisher macros Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2421 > > \author{short form}{affiliation-ref}{address-ref}{email-ref} > where is the long form of author? Right, a typo---long form should be the first argument: \author{long form}{short form}{affiliation-ref}{address-ref}{email-ref} > is `short-form' what appears in the running head? Yes. Should one break the author's name up into initials and surnames, so that the order could be different in the main title and the running head and/or different than the order in which the author would have put them (were the argument not split up)? > > \maketitle > > i miss the keywords Of course, an obvious oversight. I knew I wouldn't think of everything right off, and that omissions would be noticed, so my last post was written rather quickly, in order to get some discussion going again, and to allow me NOT to be influenced by other suggestions (not that there is necessarily anything wrong with them, but rather just to give a fresh perspective). > and abstract, which form part of the frontmatter > `package'. i think your \maketitle should be processing those too I hadn't been thinking of the abstract as part of the front matter (probably because it normally comes after \maketitle) but perhaps I should be. Other comments? What about the `affiliations' and other environments with the label-reference mechanism? -- Phillip Helbig Email ... helbig@multivac.jb.man.ac.uk Nuffield Radio Astronomy Laboratories Tel. ..... +44 1477 571 321 (ext. 297) Jodrell Bank Fax ................. +44 1477 571 618 Macclesfield Telex ................. 36149 JODREL G UK-Cheshire SK11 9DL Web .... http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pjh/ My opinions are not necessarily those of NRAL or the University of Manchester.