Message-ID:  <97100910263154@multivac.jb.man.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Date:         Thu, 9 Oct 1997 10:26:31 GMT
From: Phillip Helbig <helbig@MULTIVAC.JB.MAN.AC.UK>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: LaTeX & email (Was: LaTeX journal and publisher macros)
Status: R

> Phillip Helbig writes:
>
>  > >   So LaTeX needs not worry about email line length limitations, really.
>  >        ^^^^^
>  > Is there some confusion here?  I'm referring not to LaTeX source, but
>  > rather to email messages to this list.
>
> Maybe. The topic before was the line length in the files of the LaTeX
> distribution.

I mentioned wrapping to 72 characters in the previous thread, which I
started and which is indicated by the change in title.  Line length in
the files of the LaTeX distribution (which also shouldn't be too long)
wasn't MY original topic at all.


--
Phillip Helbig                          Email ... helbig@multivac.jb.man.ac.uk
Nuffield Radio Astronomy Laboratories   Tel. ..... +44 1477 571 321 (ext. 297)
Jodrell Bank                            Fax ................. +44 1477 571 618
Macclesfield                            Telex ................. 36149 JODREL G
UK-Cheshire SK11 9DL                    Web .... http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pjh/

My opinions are not necessarily those of NRAL or the University of Manchester.