X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["2587" "Wed" "8" "October" "1997" "20:49:36" "GMT" "Phillip Helbig" "helbig@MULTIVAC.JB.MAN.AC.UK" nil "65" "Re: LaTeX & email (Was: LaTeX journal and publisher macros)" "^Date:" nil nil "10" nil "LaTeX & email (Was: LaTeX journal and publisher macros)" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA17222; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 21:54:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <11.F44A3A33@listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 21:52:37 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 210855 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 21:52:28 +0200 Received: from multivac (multivac.jb.man.ac.uk [130.88.24.128]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA14896 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 21:52:22 +0200 (MET DST) X-VMS-To: SMTP%"LATEX-L@relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de" X-VMS-Cc: HELBIG Message-ID: <97100820493693@multivac.jb.man.ac.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 20:49:36 GMT From: Phillip Helbig Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: LaTeX & email (Was: LaTeX journal and publisher macros) Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2414 > Phillip Helbig: > >> > All the files in the latex distribution are checked for the 72 > >> > character limit as part of the Makefile that makes up the > >> > distribution. > >> > >> Last year I changed it to check for 80 characters per line. I'm not > >> going to support mail gateways that cut at 72. > > > >If 80 gets through, you can't quote it without rewrapping it yourself. > > Sure, no problem: My text editor can handle lines of more than 5000 > characters, which can be displayed without wrapping using a scroll-bar. So > I write such a line, puts it in the mail, making sure the automated > hard-wrapping feature is turned off, the letter being MIME'd. When it > arrives, the line is picked together to 5000 character length, and the > recipient displays that as is deemed suitable, say with a scroll-bar, > without wrapping. > > So LaTeX needs not worry about email line length limitations, really. ^^^^^ Is there some confusion here? I'm referring not to LaTeX source, but rather to email messages to this list. If someone writes *****$#--1----_----2----_----3----_----4----_----5----_----6----_----7-- and I quote it, it becomes > *****$#--1----_----2----_----3----_----4----_----5----_----6----_----7-- and if that gets quoted it becomes > > *****$#--1----_----2----_----3----_----4----_----5----_----6----_----7-- and again > > > *****$#--1----_----2----_----3----_----4----_----5----_----6----_----7-- another one > > > > *****$#--1----_----2----_----3----_----4----_----5----_----6----_----7-- and it is 80 characters. If it gets quoted again > > > > > *****$#--1----_----2----_----3----_----4----_----5----_----6----_----7-- then it is too long---not just for (some) email software or terminals, but to read easily (I don't want a horizontal scroll bar). If I wrap it, then I get > > > > >*****$#--1----_----2----_----3----_----4----_----5----_----6--- -_----7-- which is not what I want, since the second line should be preceded by the quote symbol as well. If someone uses "== " or some other longer quote symbol than "> " then the situation is worse. -- Phillip Helbig Email ... helbig@multivac.jb.man.ac.uk Nuffield Radio Astronomy Laboratories Tel. ..... +44 1477 571 321 (ext. 297) Jodrell Bank Fax ................. +44 1477 571 618 Macclesfield Telex ................. 36149 JODREL G UK-Cheshire SK11 9DL Web .... http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pjh/ My opinions are not necessarily those of NRAL or the University of Manchester.