X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["827" "Wed" "8" "October" "1997" "14:50:56" "+0200" "Hans Aberg" "haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE" nil "20" "Re: LaTeX journal and publisher macros" "^Date:" nil nil "10" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA30122; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 16:46:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <0.1FB419F3@listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 16:46:01 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 210616 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 16:45:53 +0200 Received: from mail.nada.kth.se (root@mail.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.92]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA23740 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 16:45:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [130.237.37.74] (sl54.modempool.kth.se [130.237.37.74]) by mail.nada.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA03685 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 16:45:41 +0200 (MET DST) X-Sender: su95-hab@mail.nada.kth.se References: from "David Carlisle" at Oct 8, 97 00:39:12 am Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199710080039.UAA01177@fenris.math.albany.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 14:50:56 +0200 From: Hans Aberg Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: LaTeX journal and publisher macros Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2398 At 20:39 -0400 97/10/07, Mark Steinberger wrote: >Many journals these days work from author-created tex files, and a >substantial portion of the authoring community uses amstex. I think the reason for this, is that the early versions of AMS-LaTeX had problems. But are there any reasons for still using AMS-TeX? >It sure would be nice if someone would distribute a good amstex to latex >converter. .. >I'm told the AMS has such a converter for in-house use, but I don't >know of one available to the public. This seems to be a good idea: It is not difficult to do the conversions by hand (that is, if each author does it), but a converter would surely help promoting AMS-LaTeX. Hans Aberg * AMS member: Listing * Email: Hans Aberg