X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["752" "Tue" "7" "October" "1997" "19:26:40" "+0200" "Hans Aberg" "haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE" nil "15" "Re: LaTeX journal and publisher macros" "^Date:" nil nil "10" nil nil nil nil nil]
	nil)
Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1])
	by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA20585;
	Tue, 7 Oct 1997 19:33:23 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <14.F8C57292@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 19:30:45 +0200
Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
          (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 210005 for
          LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 19:30:36 +0200
Received: from mail.nada.kth.se (root@mail.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.92]) by
          relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA09711 for
          <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 19:30:31 +0200
          (MET DST)
Received: from [130.237.37.102] (sl112.modempool.kth.se [130.237.37.138]) by
          mail.nada.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.4) with ESMTP id TAA08220 for
          <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>; Tue, 7 Oct 1997 19:30:29 +0200
          (MET DST)
X-Sender: su95-hab@mail.nada.kth.se
References: <m0xIEGL-000OWEC@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID:  <v03110705b060201222d3@[130.237.37.102]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <876242111.105228.BNB@MATH.AMS.ORG>
Date:         Tue, 7 Oct 1997 19:26:40 +0200
From: Hans Aberg <haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: LaTeX journal and publisher macros
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 2381

bbeeton <BNB@MATH.AMS.ORG>:
>and there are still articles submitted in plain tex, which tugboat
>is not going to refuse if the material is relevant and well written.
>in fact, as some such articles propose non-latex solutions, it may
>be impossible to process them at all using latex.  whenever possible,
>we try to group articles not only by subject, but also by processing
>method required.  in pre-latex days, it was often possible to run
>the camera-ready copy of an issue as a unit.  no more.

  I suggested LaTeX should have a PlainTeX class, so that could
conveniently migrate from PlainTeX to LaTeX...

  Hans Aberg
                  * AMS member: Listing <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
                  * Email: Hans Aberg <haberg@member.ams.org>