X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["678" "Fri" "12" "September" "1997" "09:12:53" "-0400" "Mark Steinberger" "mark@CSC.ALBANY.EDU" nil "20" "Re: HyperLaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "9" nil "HyperLaTeX" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA25762; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 15:14:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <4.D2AF2278@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 15:13:00 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 197958 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 15:13:55 +0200 Received: from sarah.albany.edu (sarah.albany.edu [169.226.1.103]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id PAA14489 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 15:13:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fenris.math.albany.edu (fenris.math.albany.edu [169.226.23.39]) by sarah.albany.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA16226 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 09:12:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mark@localhost) by fenris.math.albany.edu (8.8.4/8.8.3) id JAA15051 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 12 Sep 1997 09:12:54 -0400 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] Content-Type: text Message-ID: <199709121312.JAA15051@fenris.math.albany.edu> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <7080-Fri12Sep1997092816+0100-s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk> from "Sebastian Rahtz" at Sep 12, 97 09:28:16 am Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 09:12:53 -0400 From: Mark Steinberger Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: HyperLaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2310 > my *personal* feeling is that using dvi as the interchange file is > pretty much doomed anyway. With incompatible \specials, some expertise is needed to even be able to exchange TeX source. This complicates coauthorships, and even, to some extent, journal submissions. It also retards the knowledge growth of the average user, so the sophistication of the materials authors place on the web suffers. The end result is bad for the TeX community. This is exactly the kind of problem the latex project has solved for users of straight latex (without \specials). In the world of \specials, we have the same kind of anarchy that existed for latex 2.09 macro packages. --Mark