X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1191" "Wed" "10" "September" "1997" "16:50:01" "+0100" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "29" "Re: HyperLaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "9" nil "HyperLaTeX" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA21332; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:53:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <11.B9218A95@listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:52:09 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 196808 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:52:58 +0200 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id RAA13128 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:52:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk (snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]) by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA15219 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 16:53:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from SRAHTZ (actually host srahtz.elsevier.co.uk) by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 10 Sep 1997 16:53:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-Mailer: VM 6.33 under Emacs 19.34.4 Message-ID: <6089-Wed10Sep1997165001+0100-s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 16:50:01 +0100 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: HyperLaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2305 > interest in XML, whatever that is. :-) http://www.sil.org/sgml/xml.html > (see, I am very helpful with ref's > :-). It concerns the dynamic behaviour of links, and stuff which I have not > studied yet in detail. (There is also this other movement with cgi-scripts > coming along now, which should perhaps be mentioned.) agreed, the hypertex spec may need updating. personally, i hope HTML 4 remains a gleam in the eye of Raggett and chums and we are never plagued with it. > I figure, then it does not belong in the LaTeX3 group anyway? So if you just because you dont author in LaTeX doesnt mean you dont *use* LaTeX. I'd like to author in SGML/XML, and use (La)TeX as my formatting engine. does that make a renegade? > future development of electronic media. Hypermedia is taking off with such > a breakneck speed, so people have been telling me for 10 years now. > future. On the other hand, if the resolution of graphical displays > increases, TeX still has provided some experiences for how to produce good > typesetting. and TeX still has a great place for making printed pages back from the hypermediazed stuff Sebastian