X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1290" "Tue" "8" "July" "1997" "13:53:12" "+0200" "Ulrik Vieth" "vieth@THPHY.UNI-DUESSELDORF.DE" nil "27" "Re: TDS version?!" "^Date:" nil nil "7" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA26707; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 13:55:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <8.C597FBF8@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 13:53:26 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 166333 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 13:51:51 +0200 Received: from thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de (www.thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de [134.99.64.123]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with SMTP id NAA10723 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 13:51:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from macbeth.uni-duesseldorf.de (macbeth.thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de) by thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16736; Tue, 8 Jul 97 13:53:23 +0200 Received: by macbeth.uni-duesseldorf.de (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA24366; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 13:53:12 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <199707081153.NAA24366@macbeth.uni-duesseldorf.de> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <970708123637.ba62@vms.rhbnc.ac.uk> (CHAA006@VMS.RHBNC.AC.UK) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 13:53:12 +0200 From: Ulrik Vieth Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: TDS version?! Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2283 > My point is: the TeX-live-2 version is dated "April 1997", one and a half > years after "the second public version (November 1995)", yet has a version > number 0.1 something, not 0.9 something. Something very strange is going > on here... It is possible that the date shown in the printout of the document might be the date when it was last run through TeX, not when it was created (which you might blame on an oversight of the author). As for the TDS version numbers, the sequence went 0.98, 0.99, 0.100 ... 0.104, 0.999 followed by 0.9991 ... 0.9993 about one year later. Perhaps it would have been better to go 0.98, 0.981 ... 0.98x, 0.99, 0.991 ... 0.99x, but its obviously too late to correct this now. I suppose the best way to clean up this mess might be to re-issue the lastest TDS version (0.9993) as 1.0, publish it in TUGboat and everywhere else where it might be of an interest and freeze it once and for all. > P.S. No signs of a PDF version on CTAN, which is why I am using the TeX-live-2 > version... Why not get yourself a PDF-TeX installation, fetch the latest TDS sources, run them through TeX, and upload your tds.pdf to CTAN to do everyone else a favour if you're so concerned about it? Personally, I can live with a DVI version at the moment... Cheers, Ulrik.