X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["715" "Tue" "8" "July" "1997" "17:56:31" "+1000" "Richard Walker" "Richard.Walker@CS.ANU.EDU.AU" nil "24" "Re: discussing relation of LaTeX to TeX successors" "^Date:" nil nil "7" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA19782; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 09:56:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <6.B536402C@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 9:56:45 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 165856 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 09:56:22 +0200 Received: from flash.anu.edu.au (richard@flash.anu.edu.au [150.203.166.27]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id JAA28129 for ; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 09:56:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from richard@localhost) by flash.anu.edu.au (8.8.2/8.8.2) id RAA20667; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 17:56:31 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 References: <970617160600.38c1@vms.rhbnc.ac.uk> <199706200908.LAA02070@frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de> <199706201031.LAA19917@knott.elsevier.co.uk> <199707071846.UAA07935@puma.npc.de> <199707080127.LAA19021@flash.anu.edu.au> <199707080707.JAA14327@perdita.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under Emacs 19.34.1 Message-ID: <199707080756.RAA20667@flash.anu.edu.au> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199707080707.JAA14327@perdita.zdv.Uni-Mainz.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE id JAA19782 Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 17:56:31 +1000 From: Richard Walker Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: discussing relation of LaTeX to TeX successors Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2276 Rainer Schoepf writes: > Richard Walker writes: > > > Clearly the reason we do not have this for CTAN is the fact that TDS > > is still only a `draft' standard. > > No! The reason is that there are not enough people in the TeX world > that work on CTAN. Touch\'{e}! But surely there can not be a CTAN.pm before TDS is widely accepted (even if it is not finalized). On the other hand, maybe the availability of a CTAN.pm would encourage wide acceptance of TDS? > Most standards are drafts anyway. Errr . . . whatever you say :-) Maybe it's just because I don't think leaving it at version 0.9993 sends the right sort of message. > Rainer Schöpf (wearing his CTAN hat) Richard (with tie, no hat)