X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["805" "Fri" "4" "July" "1997" "10:13:05" "+0200" "Frank Mittelbach" "Frank.Mittelbach@UNI-MAINZ.DE" nil "23" "Re: Availability of Class files (was: LaTeX3 goals)" "^Date:" nil nil "7" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA08746 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 10:48:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <13.3C6179AA@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 10:48:13 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 163150 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 10:48:08 +0200 Received: from kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.158]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id KAA22176 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 10:48:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de (Ufrank@localhost) by kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id KAA09773 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 10:35:24 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE: Ufrank set sender to frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de!latex3 using -f Received: (from latex3@localhost) by frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA26962; Fri, 4 Jul 1997 10:13:05 +0200 References: <199707031135.MAA13033@knott.elsevier.co.uk> <199707031516.QAA14350@knott.elsevier.co.uk> <199707031522.QAA03430@fell.open.ac.uk> <199707040736.IAA16262@knott.elsevier.co.uk> Message-ID: <199707040813.KAA26962@frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199707040736.IAA16262@knott.elsevier.co.uk> Date: Fri, 4 Jul 1997 10:13:05 +0200 From: Frank Mittelbach Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Availability of Class files (was: LaTeX3 goals) Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2248 Sebastian Rahtz writes: > > > what we could do is `publish' the list and a proposed classification, > > > and ask for comments. consensus would soon arrive, i think > > > > A good idea; publish it where? and who is "we"? > > > > ask for volunteers, i suppose, and see how many people take an > interest? i guess that's the crux of the matter, isn't it? Mark has said he would be interested to help (as a coordinator?) but otherwise? Mark would you be willing to do this? so that people could mail you if they are interested to help? i know it is so much easier to write an email or two a week then to commit yourself to a measurable goal, but if you really check the time spend on either activity it isn't so much different in the end anybody: this should be in your own interest frank