References: <E0wgSvY-0006SB-00@heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk>
            <199707031009.MAA01436@frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
            <199707031135.MAA13033@knott.elsevier.co.uk>
            <199707031147.MAA03193@fell.open.ac.uk>
Message-ID:  <199707031516.QAA14350@knott.elsevier.co.uk>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <199707031147.MAA03193@fell.open.ac.uk>
Date:         Thu, 3 Jul 1997 16:16:43 +0100
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: Availability of Class files (was: LaTeX3 goals)
Status: R

 > 2.   The LaTeX Team think this is a useful activity and have such complete
 > faith in Sebastian's judgement that they agree with his classification.

i think history rules this one out

 > 3.   The LaTeX Team think this is a useful activity and have carefully
 > checked the results; therefore they agree with his classification.

4.   The LaTeX Team think this is a useful activity and have carefully
  checked the results; consequently they are looking for a less bias
  coordinator

what we could do is `publish' the list and a proposed classification,
and ask for comments. consensus would soon arrive, i think

sebastian