References: <199706211053.MAA10544@centre.univ-orleans.fr>
            <199706251619.SAA12779@centre.univ-orleans.fr>
            <199706260913.KAA24443@knott.elsevier.co.uk>
            <199706261049.LAA02846@fell.open.ac.uk>
Message-ID:  <199706261111.MAA24590@knott.elsevier.co.uk>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
In-Reply-To:  <199706261049.LAA02846@fell.open.ac.uk>
Date:         Thu, 26 Jun 1997 12:11:21 +0100
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L
              <LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Subject:      Re: ideal future document processing
Status: R

 > Only in the UK could an educated person seriously make such a statement
 > in public.  In more cultured parts of the world it would be like
 > boasting that you cannot write grammatical sentences.
 >
this is getting deja vu. didn't we have this precise exchange a year
ago, Chris?

would you like me to do a search on all the articles i can locate
being processing here, and tell you what proportion have any maths?

i don't despise scientists and their writings, why do they dismiss the
rest of the world?

sebastian