X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["772" "Thu" "19" "June" "1997" "22:14:44" "+0400" "Vladimir Volovich" "TeX@VVV.VSU.RU" nil "23" "Re: [Bug Report] Problem with INPUTENC package and TOC files." "^Date:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA31016; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 21:13:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <4.07DBDC5F@listserv.gmd.de>; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 21:13:00 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 156021 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 21:12:54 +0200 Received: from cc.vsu.ru (root@VSU-Relarn.Relarn.ru [194.226.29.62]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id VAA14376 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 21:11:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cc.vsu.ru (8.8.5-MVC-230497/8.8.5) with UUCP id XAA03603 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 23:09:21 +0400 Received: from vvv (vvv@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vvv.vrn.ru (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA00257 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 1997 22:14:44 +0400 X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.1.42 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: , <199706181237.MAA00063@ew160061.nets.de.eds.com> <199706191620.RAA07046@fell.open.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <33A97714.34BAB20B@vvv.vsu.ru> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 22:14:44 +0400 From: Vladimir Volovich Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: [Bug Report] Problem with INPUTENC package and TOC files. Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2119 Hello, Chris Rowley wrote: > Warning > ======= [...] > There are an increasing number of programs around nowadays that parse > LaTeX code directly and they are often much less forgiving than doood > old TeX itself since there originators probably RTFMed. > > So it is now becoming more important for even Frank (and me) to use > precisely correct LaTeX commands and LaTeX syntax in documents. What are the correct LaTeX commands? I think that these are exactly the commands which are correct from the TeX's point of view, aren't they? I think that those parsers, if they want to be correct, *should* parse according to the general TeX syntax (and semantics). [ But there is really only one correct parser---TeX ;-) ] -- With best regards, Vladimir.