X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1304" "Wed" "18" "June" "1997" "10:18:34" "+0100" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "32" "Re: ideal future document processing environment" "^Date:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id LAA31143; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:18:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <9.D8874E23@listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:18:43 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 155164 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:18:35 +0200 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id LAA12569 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 11:18:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk (snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]) by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA25936 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:14:50 +0100 (BST) Received: from cadair.elsevier.co.uk by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:18:46 +0100 Received: from lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk (lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.216.1]) by cadair.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA16793 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:18:38 +0100 (BST) Received: (from srahtz@localhost) by lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA06776; Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:18:34 +0100 (BST) References: <970616122025.3714@vms.rhbnc.ac.uk> <199706161526.QAA16549@knott.elsevier.co.uk> <199706171528.QAA24443@lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk> <199706171750.SAA03440@fell.open.ac.uk> Message-ID: <199706180918.KAA06776@lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199706171750.SAA03440@fell.open.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 10:18:34 +0100 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: ideal future document processing environment Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2093 > > Q1: Will there exist "document formatting professionals" in the > future? yes. in the same way there will exist car mechanics, internal decorators, cooks, what have you. however much the DIY concepts take over, there is always a place for the artist > Or will their skills have to be found in: > > -- the authors? > > -- the software? the software, of course, if you make that distinction. the question is how writes the software! i drive cars, i dont tinker with the engine. i dont make my own pasta normally either. > If both authors and document formatting professionals exist, is > supporting both with one system: if authors want to get into document formatting, they can learn about it, and do both. but they should know that they are doing so, and i think a clearer distinction between functions is desirable inevitably, people take my remarks as being `elitist' about document formatting. i don't mean that. i mean that we can all do the whole job as we always have done with LaTeX, but it would help everyone if we knew which bit was which. We _do_ that in LaTeX already, we usually author but sometimes we (some of us) write style files. But we dont have to maintain that very close integration whereby the document can interfere in the formatting at a micro level sebastian