X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["925" "Mon" "16" "June" "1997" "17:50:50" "+0200" "Bernard GAULLE" "gaulle@IDRIS.FR" nil "19" "Re: use of e-tex" "^Date:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id RAA25173; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 17:51:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <3.581C29F9@listserv.gmd.de>; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 17:51:13 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 154302 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 17:51:05 +0200 Received: from lumiere.idris.fr (root@lumiere.idris.fr [130.84.8.14]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id RAA13611 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 17:50:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from murnau.idris.fr (murnau.idris.fr [130.84.8.20]) by lumiere.idris.fr (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA03942 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 17:50:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from gaulle@localhost) by murnau.idris.fr (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA01752; Mon, 16 Jun 1997 17:50:50 +0200 Message-ID: <199706161550.RAA01752@murnau.idris.fr> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 17:50:50 +0200 From: Bernard GAULLE Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: use of e-tex Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2056 I'm afraid about the words used to say something like e-TeX is a non-sense, never used, without any kind of future, and so on... I respect the work done by the NTS group, as well as the LaTeX group, and the Omega guys. All these groups work hard to go on and make TeX able to fight with commercial products you know. Yes these works aren't fully integrated in only one project. Yes things seem not to converge. But they go and move and this is terribly unpolite to reduce their work to an amusing task without interest. No ! I support definitely all that work, they go each one in a good direction, that's all we need. Another time, in a better life, we'll see the convergent point, as we discover now that web2c 7 is the best engine today, just because it is able to concentrate various interesting tools or technics. Please accept each other and don't fight like this, it's absolutely stupid and unproductive. --bg