X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["467" "Fri" "13" "June" "1997" "10:13:10" "+0100" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "12" "Re: automatic numbering" "^Date:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA29067; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 16:46:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <10.2D96C511@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 16:06:12 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 152345 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 11:13:26 +0200 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id LAA25991 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 11:13:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk (snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]) by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA19918 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:09:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from cadair.elsevier.co.uk by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:13:21 +0100 Received: from lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk (lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.216.1]) by cadair.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA23392 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:13:13 +0100 (BST) Received: (from srahtz@localhost) by lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA10884; Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:13:10 +0100 (BST) References: <970612123021.ccf6@vms.rhbnc.ac.uk> Message-ID: <199706130913.KAA10884@lochnagarn.elsevier.co.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <970612123021.ccf6@vms.rhbnc.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 1997 10:13:10 +0100 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: automatic numbering Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2027 Philip Taylor writes: > >> b) please lets have portable programs written in the genuinely > >> popular langauges, viz TeX or C++ > > Please let's have portable programs written in the genuinely > PORTABLE languages; popularity is completely irrelevant. no, its not irrelevant at all. if language X is popular, the reliable compilers/interpreters become widely available. hence the program becomes portable. its called a _de facto standard_..... sebastian