X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["710" "Mon" "14" "April" "1997" "14:25:11" "+0200" "Matthias Clasen" "mclasen@SUN2.MATHEMATIK.UNI-FREIBURG.DE" nil "20" "Re: math fonts, etc" "^Date:" nil nil "4" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA13955; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 14:25:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <15.2643EDB2@listserv.gmd.de>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 14:25:22 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 124901 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 14:25:18 +0200 Received: from sun2.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de (sun2.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.30.2]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id OAA12101 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 14:25:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (mclasen@localhost) by sun2.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA02230 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 14:25:12 +0200 (MET DST) X-Sender: mclasen@sun2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 14:25:11 +0200 From: Matthias Clasen Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: math fonts, etc Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1932 I agree with J"org Knappen that this discussion of math font issues should be carried over to math-font-discuss. For that reason I have just subscribed to that list. The address J"org Knappen mentioned seems to be wrong. The file ftp://ftp.cogs.susx.ac.uk/pub/tex/mathfont/discuss/README gives the address math-font-request@cogs.susx.ac.uk for subscription requests. I have heard Frank Mittelbachs request for a more complete implementation than my basic virtual font one and I am trying to make my work more complete (although designing complete new alphabets is clearly beyond my metafont knowledge). Until then I will redirect questions about math font issues to math-font-discuss. Regards, Matthias