X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1758" "Sat" "5" "April" "1997" "20:03:58" "+0200" "Joachim Schrod" "schrod@ITI.INFORMATIK.TH-DARMSTADT.DE" nil "37" "Re: International documents" "^Date:" nil nil "4" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id GAA09190; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 06:04:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <11.D7A8E230@listserv.gmd.de>; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 6:04:25 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 121004 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 06:04:21 +0200 Received: from beach.frankfurt.netsurf.de (beach.frankfurt.netsurf.de [194.64.181.2]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with SMTP id GAA17463 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 06:04:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from puma.npc.de (deck-04.frankfurt.netsurf.de [194.64.181.36]) by beach.frankfurt.netsurf.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id GAA10728 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 1997 06:04:19 +0200 Received: (from schrod@localhost) by puma.npc.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA09647 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 20:04:00 +0200 Received: (from schrod@localhost) by puma.npc.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA09645; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 20:03:58 +0200 References: <199703181933.TAA09294@rasha.math.uci.edu> <199703232040.VAA25736@puma.npc.de> <3341B518.2781@math.uci.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.95) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: <199704051803.UAA09645@puma.npc.de> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <3341B518.2781@math.uci.edu> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 1997 20:03:58 +0200 From: Joachim Schrod Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: International documents Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1896 >>>>> "MO" == Marcel Oliver writes: MO> 2. There may be situations where letterspacing is MO> required (by some higher power), and TeX/LaTeX is MO> not well equipped to satisfy such demands. Why? TeX/LaTeX is well equipped for such tasks. If one needs it, one needs a font that's specially designed for this demand (ligatures must be taken care of, etc.) Then one switches the font for emphasis, just like wo do normally. VF files might be a first step towards such fonts, though I'm rather sure that stems must be changed if we change glyph distances. Joachim PS: On the topic of typographical quality, Marcel wrote MO> At least the books by Taeubner Verlag do it like this. If you mean the Informatik-Reihe -- they don't typeset at all, but take camera-ready copy from the authors. I don't know about other series, but I would not take the output of a computer books publisher as a shining example for typesetting. Several well-known large publishing houses belong to my customers -- many producers there (responsible for house styles, etc.!) don't even know what a Geviert (german for `quad') is... Neither would I take the Duden as a model, as brought up by Richard. By explicit will of its authors its content is descriptive, not prescriptive. Books like `Kaeufers Setzerlehrbuch', used for education of Typesetter's Masters (correct? Setzermeister), books by Tschichold, Aicher, Morris, etc., are better to learn from. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Joachim Schrod Email: jschrod@acm.org Net & Publication Consultance GmbH Tel.: +49-6074-861530 Roedermark, Germany Fax: +49-6074-861531