X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["841" "Tue" "1" "April" "1997" "17:23:36" "-0800" "Marcel Oliver" "oliver@MATH.UCI.EDU" nil "24" "Re: International documents" "^Date:" nil nil "4" nil "International documents" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id DAA15199; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 03:23:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <0.BF920A4F@listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 3:23:51 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 119774 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 02:23:44 +0100 Received: from math.uci.edu (root@math.uci.edu [128.200.174.70]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id DAA09862 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 03:23:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rasha.math.uci.edu by math.uci.edu (8.8.5) id RAA17351; Tue, 1 Apr 1997 17:23:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from rasha.math.uci.edu by rasha.math.uci.edu (8.8.5) id BAA00613; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 01:23:37 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; IRIX 6.2 IP22) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <199703181933.TAA09294@rasha.math.uci.edu> <199703232040.VAA25736@puma.npc.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <3341B518.2781@math.uci.edu> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 17:23:36 -0800 From: Marcel Oliver Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: International documents Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1895 Joachim Schrod wrote: > > >>>>> "MO" == Marcel Oliver writes: > MO> It seems standard in German mathematical typesetting to use > MO> letterspacing for "emphasis" (e.g. for defining words), while italics > MO> are reserved for theorems and such. > > No, it's not standard. Emphasis is done with italics, as in every > civilized country. In fact, the typesetter of the book in question > should be calfatered, forced to listen a few days to Modern Talking, > or some similar punishment. At least the books by Taeubner Verlag do it like this. I don't want to get into an aestetic discussion, but simply note that 1. emphasis could be a language dependent feature 2. There may be situations where letterspacing is required (by some higher power), and TeX/LaTeX is not well equipped to satisfy such demands. Marcel