X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1058" "Thu" "13" "February" "1997" "15:00:43" "-0700" "Narendra Ravi" "naren@cs.ualberta.ca" nil "25" "Re: International documents" "^Date:" nil nil "2" nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id XAA29674; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 23:01:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <4.46A7C623@listserv.gmd.de>; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 23:01:14 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 100815 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 23:01:09 +0100 Received: from scapa.cs.ualberta.ca (root@scapa.cs.ualberta.ca [129.128.4.44]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.6/8.7.4) with ESMTP id XAA28897 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 23:01:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from square-crk.cs.ualberta.ca by scapa.cs.ualberta.ca id <13496-16485>; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 15:00:56 -0700 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <97Feb13.150056-0700_mst.13496-16485+236@scapa.cs.ualberta.ca> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199702132041.VAA24041@frank.zdv.uni-mainz.de> from "Frank Mittelbach" at Feb 13, 97 09:41:18 pm Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 15:00:43 -0700 From: Narendra Ravi Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: International documents Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1804 > but before going into interface questions, what are the items related > to language? what are the answers to the above questions? > > good night > frank I have been following this discussion and agree with Frank. I have one request/suggestion. There must already exist a list of language dependent items under consideration. It will help a lot if this list is posted to this mailing list. This will give us an idea of what Frank is talking about. Judging from the discussion so far, the only issue of concern across different languages seems to be hyphenation. I'm sure several people will correct me :-). Dates are not really an issue, because, I consider dates to have a meaning, and authors are responsible for all content related issues. In my opinion both "Dec 10, 1996" and "9 Jan 1997" are OK. If authors choose to write the date in a different form, then they are risking misinterpretation. LaTeX can and must only handle aspects of presentation and not interpret the content of documents. -- Narendra Ravi Email : naren@cs.ualberta.ca