X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["240" "Wed" "22" "May" "1996" "14:30:07" "+0100" "KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE" "KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE" nil "7" "Re: More on fontdimensions" "^Date:" nil nil "5" nil "More on fontdimensions" nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA26836; Thu, 23 May 1996 04:40:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <5.70533AF5@listserv.gmd.de>; Thu, 23 May 1996 4:40:32 +0200 Received: from URZINFO.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by URZINFO.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 97921 for LATEX-L@URZINFO.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 23 May 1996 04:40:18 +0200 Received: from MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE (dzdmza.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.30]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.5/8.7.4) with ESMTP id EAA27223 for ; Thu, 23 May 1996 04:40:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from decnet-daemon (KNAPPEN@VKPMZD) by MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE (PMDF V5.0-4 #10401) id <01I50CTMRDHSANBLWI@MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE> for LATEX-L@URZINFO.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 22 May 1996 14:30:07 +0100 X-VMS-To: MZDMZA::IN%"LATEX-L@URZINFO.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE" MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <01I50CTMRNUQANBLWI@MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 14:30:07 +0100 From: KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: More on fontdimensions Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1747 Ken, I'm not really concerned with hard disk space (the pk files are much more an issue here) but with TeX memory space. Since a typical TeX job may contain more than 100 fonts, the optimisation may be usefull here. Yours, J"org Knappen.