X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["573" "Fri" "17" "May" "1996" "20:27:33" "+0100" "KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE" "KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE" nil "13" "More on fontdimensions" "^Date:" nil nil "5" nil "More on fontdimensions" nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA16452; Fri, 17 May 1996 22:35:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv.gmd.de by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <8.AA384388@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 17 May 1996 22:35:51 +0200 Received: from URZINFO.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by URZINFO.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 92208 for LATEX-L@URZINFO.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 17 May 1996 20:26:32 +0200 Received: from MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE (dzdmzb.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.33]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.7.5/8.7.4) with ESMTP id UAA26332 for ; Fri, 17 May 1996 20:26:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from decnet-daemon (KNAPPEN@VKPMZD) by MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE (PMDF V5.0-4 #10401) id <01I4TPOFZ82OAM2JEY@MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE> for latex-l@urzinfo.urz.uni-heidelberg.de; Fri, 17 May 1996 20:27:33 +0100 X-VMS-To: IN"latex-l@urzinfo.urz.uni-heidelberg.de" MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Message-ID: <01I4TPOG0TYAAM2JEY@MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 20:27:33 +0100 From: KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: More on fontdimensions Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1740 I have now a test implementation with the additional fontdimensions above Nr. 22. Unfortunately, this causes the tfm files and the space needed in the font memory to grow more then necessary, because all empty fontdimensions are automatically set to zeroes. Therefore I'd like to ask, if this waste of space is tolerable, or whether the additional font dimensions should low numbers again. Since there are less than 13 (or even 22) additional dimensions, the dc fonts can't be mistaken for math italic or math extension fonts by TeX. What do you think? --J"org Knappen.