X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["257" "Thu" "29" "June" "1995" "12:29:29" "+0100" "Sebastian Rahtz" "Sebastian.Rahtz@CL.CAM.AC.UK" nil "6" "Re: (La)TeX is SGML?" "^Date:" nil nil "6" nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE (vzdmzi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.15]) by trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA31856 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 13:32:46 +0200 Received: from DIRECTORY-DAEMON by MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE (PMDF V4.3-12 #4432) id <01HSA3AVM1JK9353JM@MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE>; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 13:32:44 +0100 Received: from mxrelay.gmd.de by MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE (PMDF V4.3-12 #4432) id <01HSA3AREXWG9AMIKT@MZDMZA.ZDV.UNI-MAINZ.DE>; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 13:32:40 +0100 Received: from vm.gmd.de by mxrelay.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v0.1a) with SMTP id 3F370208 ; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 13:32:30 +0200 Received: from VM.GMD.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DEARN) by VM.GMD.DE (LMail V1.2b/1.8b) with BSMTP id 3126; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 13:32:06 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV release 1.8b) with NJE id 2478 for LATEX-L@VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 13:30:01 +0000 Received: from DHDURZ1 (NJE origin SMTP@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3852; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 13:28:45 +0000 Received: from swan.cl.cam.ac.uk by vm.urz.Uni-Heidelberg.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP; Thu, 29 Jun 95 13:28:44 CET Received: from ouse.cl.cam.ac.uk (user spqr100 (rfc931)) by swan.cl.cam.ac.uk with SMTP (PP-6.5) to cl; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 12:29:33 +0100 In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Jun 1995 13:10:29 +0200." <"swan.cl.cam.:101630:950629111314"@cl.cam.ac.uk> Reply-to: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Message-id: <"swan.cl.cam.:110180:950629112935"@cl.cam.ac.uk> X-Envelope-to: schoepf@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 12:29:29 +0100 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: (La)TeX is SGML? Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1668 > (`emphasis'), but also missing TAGCs: `' > or ' is perfectly legal SGML. And, did you know that > `<>' repeats the previous element? hey, thats really interesting. thanks for point that out, Joachim. sebastian