X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["445" "Tue" "15" "March" "1994" "16:35:02" "+0100" "J%org Knappen, Mainz" "KNAPPEN@VKPMZD.KPH.UNI-MAINZ.DE" nil "16" "Re: nag nag nag" "^Date:" nil nil "3" nil nil nil nil] nil) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA16703; Tue, 15 Mar 94 16:36:58 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA17188; Tue, 15 Mar 94 16:36:54 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA14326 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Tue, 15 Mar 1994 16:36:52 +0100 Message-Id: <199403151536.AA14326@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4850; Tue, 15 Mar 94 16:36:14 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4849; Tue, 15 Mar 1994 16:36:14 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1645; Tue, 15 Mar 1994 16:35:22 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 16:35:02 +0100 From: "J%org Knappen, Mainz" Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: nag nag nag Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1603 Laurent, you wrote :Is that too much to ask of 2e? : : Laurent Siebenmann Yes, it is too much. Because LaTeX2e is designed to introduce stability in the LaTeX world (the instability was caused by the proliferation of LaTeXes with different font selections etc.). It is not yet LaTeX3. Yours, J"org Knappen. P.S. It seems that you have missed some of the earlier traffic on this list. Face some harsh reactions...