X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil]
	["232" "Fri" "11" "March" "1994" "16:58:50" "GMT" "Sebastian Rahtz" "spqr@FTP.TEX.AC.UK" nil "8" "Re: AMS-LaTeX 1.1 patch for LaTeX2e" "^Date:" nil nil "3" nil nil nil nil]
	nil)
Return-Path: <owner-latex-l@VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) 
        by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93)
	id AA08044; Fri, 11 Mar 94 18:24:38 +0100
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93)
	id AA23049; Fri, 11 Mar 94 18:24:06 +0100
Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA24637
  (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Fri, 11 Mar 1994 18:24:04 +0100
Message-Id: <199403111724.AA24637@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 4877; Fri, 11 Mar 94 18:23:29 +0200
Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by
 TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4876; Fri,
 11 Mar 1994 18:23:29 +0200
Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by
 VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3496; Fri,
 11 Mar 1994 18:22:40 +0000
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  <9403111655.AA10159@ftp.tex.ac.uk>
Date:         Fri, 11 Mar 1994 16:58:50 GMT
From: Sebastian Rahtz <spqr@FTP.TEX.AC.UK>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: AMS-LaTeX 1.1 patch for LaTeX2e
Status: R
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 1591

i am out of my depth here a little, but are the `dm' fonts not virtual
dc fonts pointing back at cm fonts? coming from somewhere in France.
and I am sure someone in Czech/Slovakia did it too.

just use Lucida Bright :-}


sebastian