X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["2417" "Fri" "11" "March" "1994" "17:07:42" "+0100" "Peter Dalgaard SFE" "pd@KUBISM.KU.DK" nil "47" "Re: AMS-LaTeX 1.1 patch for LaTeX2e" "^Date:" nil nil "3" nil nil nil nil] nil) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA07872; Fri, 11 Mar 94 17:10:10 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA22483; Fri, 11 Mar 94 17:10:09 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA23018 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Fri, 11 Mar 1994 17:10:06 +0100 Message-Id: <199403111610.AA23018@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4453; Fri, 11 Mar 94 17:09:32 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 4452; Fri, 11 Mar 1994 17:09:32 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3238; Fri, 11 Mar 1994 17:08:24 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Fri, 11 Mar 1994 17:07:42 +0100 From: Peter Dalgaard SFE Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: AMS-LaTeX 1.1 patch for LaTeX2e Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1589 > peter dalgaard asks if ams-latex 1.2 will support dc fonts (t1 > encoding). > > because the purpose of ams-latex is to set mathematical material, > it doesn't make a lot of sense to implement a font system that > doesn't yet provide appropriate math fonts. also, ams has a policy > of accepting submissions prepared in ams-latex, and because of the > absence of compatible math fonts, or even compatible text fonts for > the hardware being used, would not be able to process -- in a > production environment -- submissions utilizing dc fonts. > for those reasons, i don't believe that version 1.2 will provide > a native implementation of the dc fonts. I'm not sure whether it is appropriate to continue this discussion here, but it seems that the T1 encoding and math fonts issue is important not just for AMS-LaTeX. A few basic issues - The DC encoded fonts are currently the only way to get hyphenation to work in languages with accented characters without modifying TeX itself. - The DC fonts not only adds characters above 128, but shuffles those below 32 around as well. This causes the occasional problem with \mathchardef's in .sty files and so on. - Apart from that, there is NO problem with mixing DC fonts with the good ol' math fonts from the CM and AMS series. What annoys me is that people seem to believe that it is necessary to have 256-char math fonts before DC fonts can be used for anything except plain text. This simply isn't true, and it confuses me that no-one in Germany or France seem to have noticed (German and French has the hyphenation problem much worse that Danish, which has only a single accented letter). Sorry if I sound P'ed off, but the implication of the matter is that I feel left with the options of either having to do some of my usual nonstandard, half-assed hacking in order to get a decent environment for typing mathematical papers in my natural language or postponing the installation of LaTeX2e into the indefinite future. I can imagine a rather large number of sysadmins being put in a similar dilemma. BTW. I also don't understand why nobody seems to have found it worthwhile to create a set of .vf files implementing the T1 encoding with CM glyphs. (Can't be done perfectly, of course, since not all glyphs are there) With these in place, it would be possible to process and print papers without any additional fonts at all. Peter Dalgaard