X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1057" "Fri" "11" "March" "1994" "10:52:14" "+0100" "Peter Dalgaard SFE" "pd@KUBISM.KU.DK" nil "23" "Re: AMS-LaTeX 1.1 patch for LaTeX2e" "^Date:" nil nil "3" nil nil nil nil] nil) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA06344; Fri, 11 Mar 94 10:55:40 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA19651; Fri, 11 Mar 94 10:55:09 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA13412 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Fri, 11 Mar 1994 10:55:06 +0100 Message-Id: <199403110955.AA13412@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1366; Fri, 11 Mar 94 10:54:31 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1365; Fri, 11 Mar 1994 10:54:31 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 1889; Fri, 11 Mar 1994 10:53:40 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Fri, 11 Mar 1994 10:52:14 +0100 From: Peter Dalgaard SFE Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: AMS-LaTeX 1.1 patch for LaTeX2e Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1587 > > ----------------------------Original message---------------------------- > Development work is under way to produce version 1.2 of AMS-LaTeX which > will be designed specifically for LaTeX2e. I.e., it will contain > documentclass files that take advantage of various improvements provided > by LaTeX2e. If all goes well AMS-LaTeX 1.2 will be released more or less > simultaneously with the first full, official release of LaTeX2e, i.e. > the release that makes LaTeX2.09 obsolete and makes `standard LaTeX' > synonymous with LaTeX2e. > Ralph Youngen > Technical Support Manager > American Mathematical Society > Internet: REY@MATH.AMS.ORG > Any info on whether DC fonts (T1 enc.) will be supported? Previous versions have had problems with math symbols taken from roman font, e.g. $\bar x$ gives overstrike, etc. The changes are mostly trivial, once one knows where to look, but it is a pain to fix locally (there is always one more correction to make and J. Clueless User will stumble upon it at the least convenient time...) Peter Dalgaard