X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["245" "Mon" "21" "February" "1994" "08:46:30" "GMT" "Dean Ayres" "dean.ayres@aea.orgn.uk" nil "7" "Re: A philosophical question about packages and options" "^Date:" nil nil "2" nil nil nil nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA13152; Mon, 21 Feb 94 09:52:36 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA03011; Mon, 21 Feb 94 09:51:04 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA03287 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Mon, 21 Feb 1994 09:51:03 +0100 Message-Id: <199402210851.AA03287@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 6048; Mon, 21 Feb 94 09:50:43 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 6047; Mon, 21 Feb 1994 09:50:43 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8610; Mon, 21 Feb 1994 09:50:02 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Mon, 21 Feb 1994 08:46:30 GMT From: Dean Ayres Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: A philosophical question about packages and options Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1576 > I only quote this to point out that I am not alone in not understanding the > distinction between option, package and class. Why this obfuscation? You've already posted a very similar message before. Your arguments seem to be recycled. Dean