X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["724" "Thu" "17" "February" "1994" "08:39:51" "GMT" "Dean Ayres" "dean.ayres@aea.orgn.uk" nil "20" "Piff'ed off." "^Date:" nil nil "2" nil nil nil nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA02217; Thu, 17 Feb 94 09:48:36 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA05165; Thu, 17 Feb 94 09:47:33 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA28489 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Thu, 17 Feb 1994 09:47:01 +0100 Message-Id: <199402170847.AA28489@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 7869; Thu, 17 Feb 94 09:46:10 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7868; Thu, 17 Feb 1994 09:46:07 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8984; Thu, 17 Feb 1994 09:45:30 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 08:39:51 GMT From: Dean Ayres Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Piff'ed off. Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1570 Mike Piff said; > I am certainly > in favour of disentangling this code and keeping compatibility with 2.09 as a > first step towards 3. Well why not do it then, Mike, instead of constantly bemoaning it. Most of your messages to this list have little point, other than (perhaps) to score points against members of the LaTeX3 team and others closely associated with the work. Life is too short for this kind of thing. >Please take me off this list. hanks.s > > Tsong-Min Wu Is this someone else who has left the list, sick of the on-going tirade and arguments from Dr Piff? I'll be joining Tsong-Min Wu very soon, if this list doesn't return to reasoned (and reasonable) debate about LaTeX3. Dean Ayres AEA Technology, UK