X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1065" "Wed" " 9" "February" "1994" "14:29:48" "-0500" "bbeeton" "BNB@MATH.AMS.ORG" "<199402092031.AA29651@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "20" "collective documents [was exam papers]" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020919:29:48" "collective documents [was exam papers]" nil "<01H8OML5TJTU9ODWAN@MATH.AMS.ORG>"]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA11286; Wed, 9 Feb 94 21:33:26 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA26668; Wed, 9 Feb 94 21:31:25 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA29651 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Wed, 9 Feb 1994 21:31:23 +0100 Message-Id: <199402092031.AA29651@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8065; Wed, 09 Feb 94 21:31:12 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 8064; Wed, 9 Feb 1994 21:31:12 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 7849; Wed, 9 Feb 1994 21:30:29 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <01H8OML5TJTU9ODWAN@MATH.AMS.ORG> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 1994 14:29:48 -0500 From: bbeeton Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: collective documents [was exam papers] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1499 david rhead: I guess that there are some structures that LaTeX 2.09/2e doesn't handle particularly well. E.g. * conference-proceedings * issue of a journal, made up of a lot of individual contributions If it is desired that LaTeX3 should support such structures, some thought will need to be given to these structures over the next "two years". indeed there is a desire -- at least *i* desire (as editor of tugboat) -- that such collective documents be handled in a more amiable manner than is possible at present. i haven't time to assume responsibility for the whole task, but if someone else will take charge, i will be willing to join in discussion and help to define the relevant criteria for reporting to the group. on a peripherally related matter, where can the latest version of the volunteer task list be found? in tugboat 13 #4, shsu.edu was cited as the location, in [fileserv.vol-task] . i've just checked there, and the file is dated april 1993; hardly current ... -- bb