Message-Id: <199402091159.AA15093@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
In-Reply-To:  (Your message of Wed,
              09 Feb 94 12:41:15 N.)
              <9402091146.AA22033@gauss.math.uni-frankfurt.de>
Date:         Wed, 9 Feb 1994 13:02:26 +0100
From: Anselm Lingnau <lingnau@MATH.UNI-FRANKFURT.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L <LATEX-L@DHDURZ1.BITNET>
Subject:      Re: Continuation lines
Status: R

Joachim Schrod <schrod@ITI.INFORMATIK.TH-DARMSTADT.DE> writes:

> It means use \@footline (or however it
> is called in LaTeX) to put your bloody sentence there.
                                  ^^^^^^
I believe that Mike wanted to know about the possibility of implementing
something without having to change LaTeX internals (the \output routine, as it
were). It turns out that it *is* possible, if nonobvious. So Mike (among
others, myself included) has learned something, and we can pretty much
consider the matter closed, especially in the light of Joachim's last answer,
whose technical contents, as usual, hits the spot. I, for one, am of the
opinion that expletives like the above are uncalled for in professional
communication.

Anselm
--
Anselm Lingnau .................................. lingnau@math.uni-frankfurt.de
It is a mustatement that too much use of Dissociated Press can be a
developediment to your real work. Sometimes to the point of outragedy.
                                       --- Richard Stallman, *GNU Emacs Manual*