X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["172" "Tue" " 8" "February" "1994" "14:12:13" "EST" "David M. Jones" "dmjones@THEORY.LCS.MIT.EDU" "<199402090749.AA09367@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de>" "6" "additional features" "^Date:" nil nil "2" "1994020819:12:13" "additional features" nil nil]) Return-Path: Received: from sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (mailserv) by dagobert.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0/24.6.93) id AA09646; Wed, 9 Feb 94 08:49:37 +0100 Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de by sc.ZIB-Berlin.DE (4.1/SMI-4.0-sc/03.06.93) id AA22548; Wed, 9 Feb 94 08:49:27 +0100 Received: from tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de with SMTP id AA09367 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4(mail.m4[1.12]) for <@MAIL.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE:Schoepf@SC.ZIB-BERLIN.DE>); Wed, 9 Feb 1994 08:49:25 +0100 Message-Id: <199402090749.AA09367@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de> Received: from TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE by tubvm.cs.tu-berlin.de (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 2926; Wed, 09 Feb 94 08:49:13 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin MAILER@DHDURZ1) by TUBVM.CS.TU-BERLIN.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 2925; Wed, 9 Feb 1994 08:49:11 +0200 Received: from VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (NJE origin LISTSERV@DHDURZ1) by VM.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 3995; Tue, 8 Feb 1994 20:21:47 +0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Tue, 8 Feb 1994 14:12:13 EST From: "David M. Jones" Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: additional features Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1476 Ok, one of the reasons to avoid a 3rd type of brace for a new optional argument convinced me. (I won't say which one, in order to avoid endless jihad. :-) Cheers, David.